IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute
conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute-01
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-15
|
01 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: Colin Perkins , Internet Research Steering Group , draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute@ietf.org, … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: Colin Perkins , Internet Research Steering Group , draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute@ietf.org, icnrg-chairs@ietf.org, ietf@dkutscher.net, irtf-chair@irtf.org Cc: IETF-Announce , The IESG , iana@iana.org Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute-10 The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute-10 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'ICN Traceroute Protocol Specification' as an Experimental RFC. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WGs IPPM and INTAREA, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute/ A URL of the reviewed Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute/ The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743 Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
2023-08-15
|
01 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
2023-08-15
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2023-08-15
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
2023-08-10
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2023-08-10
|
01 | Martin Duke | [Ballot comment] Thanks for resolving my DISCUSS. |
2023-08-10
|
01 | Martin Duke | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Martin Duke has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
2023-08-10
|
01 | Lars Eggert | New version available: conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute-01.txt |
2023-08-10
|
00 | Lars Eggert | Shepherding AD changed to Lars Eggert |
2023-08-10
|
00 | Andrew Alston | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Andrew Alston |
2023-08-09
|
00 | Erik Kline | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline |
2023-08-09
|
00 | Paul Wouters | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Paul Wouters |
2023-08-09
|
00 | Zaheduzzaman Sarker | [Ballot comment] Supporting Martin's discuss and I think this conflict review should at least indicate IPPM as related working group. |
2023-08-09
|
00 | Zaheduzzaman Sarker | Ballot comment text updated for Zaheduzzaman Sarker |
2023-08-08
|
00 | Martin Duke | [Ballot discuss] ICN Ping and Traceroute seem to be quite similar. I am filing a DISCUSS to synchronize the conflict reviews so that they have … [Ballot discuss] ICN Ping and Traceroute seem to be quite similar. I am filing a DISCUSS to synchronize the conflict reviews so that they have a consistent posture. |
2023-08-08
|
00 | Martin Duke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Martin Duke |
2023-08-07
|
00 | Zaheduzzaman Sarker | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker |
2023-08-05
|
00 | Jim Guichard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard |
2023-08-04
|
00 | John Scudder | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for John Scudder |
2023-08-02
|
00 | Murray Kucherawy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy |
2023-08-01
|
00 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot comment] Beside using BCP14 w/o the right template for an experimental protocol ;-) I would also have cited IPPM & INTAREA as related IETF … [Ballot comment] Beside using BCP14 w/o the right template for an experimental protocol ;-) I would also have cited IPPM & INTAREA as related IETF WG (cfr conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icnping-00). But, indeed the core conflict review status is: no conflict with IETF work. |
2023-08-01
|
00 | Éric Vyncke | Ballot comment text updated for Éric Vyncke |
2023-08-01
|
00 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot comment] Beside using BCP14 w/o the right template for an experimental protocol ;-) I would also have cited IPPM & INTAREA as related IETF … [Ballot comment] Beside using BCP14 w/o the right template for an experimental protocol ;-) I would also have cited IPPM & INTAREA as related IETF WG (cfr conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icnping-00). |
2023-08-01
|
00 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke |
2023-07-19
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Telechat date has been changed to 2023-08-10 from 2023-07-13 |
2023-07-19
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
2023-07-19
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Created "Approve" ballot |
2023-07-19
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
2023-07-19
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | New version available: conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute-00.txt |
2023-07-13
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
2023-07-13
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Shepherding AD changed to Roman Danyliw |
2023-07-11
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2023-07-13 |
2023-07-11
|
00 | Colin Perkins | IETF conflict review requested |