IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations
conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations-03

Yes

Erik Kline

No Objection

Murray Kucherawy
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Martin Duke)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Erik Kline
Yes
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2022-02-15 for -01) Not sent 
Note: the proposed conflict review response in this ballot isn't using one of the predefined templates.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2022-02-17 for -01) Sent 
The related-but-no-conflict response is correct.  However, the details are too broad: the document explicitly mentions that the DNS can be used as an NRS, but there's otherwise no other ICN-related work in the IETF.
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Duke Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -01)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent