Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering
conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering-01

Yes

Erik Kline
Éric Vyncke

No Objection

Jim Guichard
Murray Kucherawy
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
(Lars Eggert)
(Robert Wilton)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Erik Kline
Yes
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Jim Guichard
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Comment (2023-10-04 for -00) Not sent
I don’t think SPRING is all that closely related, but I’m not hung up about it.
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2023-10-05) Sent for earlier
 - This documents claim of "state-of-the-art multipath congestion control algorithms", whether it can claims something like that by referencing a publication or not. (may be this should go to the ICCRG as a question or comment on the draft, let have a short discussion on this during telechat )
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2023-10-05 for -00) Sent
While I share John's view that this seems to have some relation to spring - I don't feel its sufficient conflict to block the document.

As a further observation however, I think this document could use a glossary of terms or a definitions section to expand numerous acronyms in the document.  This would make the document far easier to parse :)
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Not sent

                            
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Not sent