Ballot for conflict-review-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
I agree with Terry though.
Terry's very popular on this one; I too agree with his Discuss.
I agree with Terry's discuss and Stephen's wondering why this isn't in the IETF stream.
I agree with Terry's discuss as well.
I agree with everyone who's agreeing with Terry's Discuss ...
Terry's discuss sounds right to me. And while I've no other issue with the content of the document I do wonder why it'd not be better to process this as an IETF stream document, just in case.
Changing my position to No Objection after the IANA Considerations section was updated. Thank you for addressing this.