IETF conflict review for draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
conflict-review-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework-00

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Suresh Krishnan Yes

Mirja K├╝hlewind Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Comment (2019-05-29)
Section 10's heading is "Relation to other IETF Technologies" -- the
"other" seems out of place in an ISE-stream document.

I don't know (and didn't attempt to check) how consistent Appendix B.4
is with the various BCPs on HTTP/URI usage.

It's interesting to see C.3, "Schemas in JSON" given that the IETF has
mostly punted on JSON schemas, but perhaps this is just the market going
where it needs to go.

Barry Leiba No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection