IETF conflict review for draft-li-arch-sat
conflict-review-li-arch-sat-00

Yes

Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
John Scudder

No Objection

Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Murray Kucherawy
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Gunter Van de Velde
Yes
Jim Guichard
Yes
Comment (2024-07-31) Not sent 
As the responsible AD for this conflict review, I have concluded that the document is related to IETF work but that relationship does not prevent publication. 

As specified in the abstract, this document proposes a scalable routing architecture for satellite networks based on existing routing protocols and mechanisms, enhanced with scheduled link connectivity change information.  This document proposes no protocol changes. The author further clarifies that this is an individual piece of work that presents their view, and that view is not the consensus of the IETF community.

The work has been presented in the TVR and RTGWG WG within the Routing area but was not adopted, primarily because current satellite networks are proprietary and little information is generally available for analysis and discussion, and therefore standardization by the IETF community.
John Scudder
Yes
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Erik Kline
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection