Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa
conflict-review-pornin-deterministic-dsa-00

Yes

(Sean Turner)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2012-10-11)
The header of the document now says "Internet Engineering Task Force". That is incorrect. Please fix before publication.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-10-11)
There was a bunch of mail discussing this on the CFRG list but 
I'm not clear if that reached closure or not. It would be good if
the ISE wanted to check with the chairs of the CFRG to see if
they think there are any comments there that might usefully be
addressed before this becomes an RFC. (In particular I don't
think I saw the author answering those comments but perhaps
he's not on the CFRG list?)