IETF conflict review for draft-saintandre-jabberid
conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid-00

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Richard Barnes) Yes

Barry Leiba Yes

(Pete Resnick) Yes

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2014-02-18)
No email
send info
The security considerations could mention that including this might
help bind the email From and JID for surveillance purposes as well
as for spam.

I'd argue that the 2nd "ought" is too weak: s/ought/need to/ would
be better IMO. (And in case I got the count wrong, I mean the one
where you say a UA "ought" allow the user to stop sending this.)

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection