IETF conflict review for draft-saintandre-jabberid
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
(Jari Arkko) Yes
(Richard Barnes) Yes
Barry Leiba Yes
(Pete Resnick) Yes
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
The security considerations could mention that including this might help bind the email From and JID for surveillance purposes as well as for spam. I'd argue that the 2nd "ought" is too weak: s/ought/need to/ would be better IMO. (And in case I got the count wrong, I mean the one where you say a UA "ought" allow the user to stop sending this.)