IETF conflict review for draft-saintandre-jabberid
conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid-00
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2014-02-24
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-saintandre-jabberid@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-saintandre-jabberid@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-saintandre-jabberid-12 The IESG has completed a review of draft-saintandre-jabberid-12 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'The Jabber-ID Header Field' as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the XMPP WG, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-jabberid/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
|
2014-02-24
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
|
2014-02-24
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2014-02-24
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
|
2014-02-20
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
|
2014-02-20
|
00 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
|
2014-02-20
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
|
2014-02-20
|
00 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
|
2014-02-20
|
00 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
|
2014-02-19
|
00 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
|
2014-02-19
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
|
2014-02-18
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
|
2014-02-18
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] The security considerations could mention that including this might help bind the email From and JID for surveillance purposes as well as for … [Ballot comment] The security considerations could mention that including this might help bind the email From and JID for surveillance purposes as well as for spam. I'd argue that the 2nd "ought" is too weak: s/ought/need to/ would be better IMO. (And in case I got the count wrong, I mean the one where you say a UA "ought" allow the user to stop sending this.) |
|
2014-02-18
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
|
2014-02-18
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
|
2014-02-18
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
|
2014-02-17
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
|
2014-02-11
|
00 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
|
2014-02-10
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Pete Resnick | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Pete Resnick | Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Pete Resnick | Removed telechat returning item indication |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Pete Resnick | Telechat date has been changed to 2014-02-20 from 2014-02-06 |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Pete Resnick | New version available: conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid-00.txt |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
|
2014-02-06
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Shepherding AD changed to Pete Resnick |
|
2014-01-29
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | The draft draft-saintandre-jabberid-12 is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The … The draft draft-saintandre-jabberid-12 is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The following is some background for this draft, please forward it to IESG along with this request ... Its title is: The Jabber-ID Header Field Its abstract says: "This document defines a header field that enables the author of an email or netnews message to include a Jabber ID in the message header block for the purpose of associating the author with a particular Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) address." It was reviewed for me by Dave Cridland and Alexy Melnikov, the author worked with them to address the issues they raised. |
|
2014-01-29
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-02-06 |
|
2014-01-29
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IETF conflict review requested |