Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-savage-eigrp
conflict-review-savage-eigrp-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-09-08
00 Amy Vezza
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-savage-eigrp@ietf.org
Cc: The IESG , , 
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-savage-eigrp@ietf.org
Cc: The IESG , , 
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-savage-eigrp-04

The IESG has completed a review of draft-savage-eigrp-04 consistent with
RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Enhanced Interior
Gateway Routing Protocol'  as an Informational
RFC.


The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
and IETF work.

The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-savage-eigrp/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-savage-eigrp/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary



2015-09-08
00 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the conflict review response
2015-09-08
00 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2015-09-08
00 Amy Vezza Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent
2015-09-03
00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2015-09-03
00 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2015-09-02
00 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

I don't object, but two points....

- The title doesn't mention Cisco. The 1st sentence of the
intro does. I always find including …
[Ballot comment]

I don't object, but two points....

- The title doesn't mention Cisco. The 1st sentence of the
intro does. I always find including such information in the
title useful - I think it means far fewer readers might end
up confused about the status of the eventual RFC. I would
hope (and encourage) the ISE to have that included in the
title whenever possible as that is one of the ways in which
we can get value from the Independent stream (I mean
documenting proprietary protocols that might one day be
input to the IETF stream).

- Without having read the rest of the document (sorry, but
it is loooooong), I really didn't find the security considerations
convincing at all.  I wish I had a better understanding of
the kind of review the ISE calls for for such drafts. Generalising,
ISE stream security considerations text seems to arrive at 5742
review at an almost random point on a continuum from really
not good to great.
2015-09-02
00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2015-09-02
00 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2015-09-02
00 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2015-09-02
00 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2015-09-01
00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2015-09-01
00 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2015-08-31
00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2015-08-31
00 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2015-08-28
00 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2015-08-27
00 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2015-08-21
00 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2015-08-18
00 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2015-08-18
00 Alvaro Retana Created "Approve" ballot
2015-08-18
00 Alvaro Retana Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review
2015-08-18
00 Alvaro Retana New version available: conflict-review-savage-eigrp-00.txt
2015-08-18
00 Alvaro Retana Telechat date has been changed to 2015-09-03 from 2015-08-20
2015-08-18
00 Alvaro Retana Shepherding AD changed to Alvaro Retana
2015-08-18
00 Alvaro Retana Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd
2015-08-18
00 Cindy Morgan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-08-20
2015-08-17
00 Nevil Brownlee IETF conflict review requested