IETF conflict review for draft-savage-eigrp
conflict-review-savage-eigrp-00
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2015-09-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-savage-eigrp@ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-savage-eigrp@ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-savage-eigrp-04 The IESG has completed a review of draft-savage-eigrp-04 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol' as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-savage-eigrp/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-savage-eigrp/ The process for such documents is described at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
2015-09-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
2015-09-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2015-09-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
2015-09-03
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2015-09-03
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2015-09-02
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] I don't object, but two points.... - The title doesn't mention Cisco. The 1st sentence of the intro does. I always find including … [Ballot comment] I don't object, but two points.... - The title doesn't mention Cisco. The 1st sentence of the intro does. I always find including such information in the title useful - I think it means far fewer readers might end up confused about the status of the eventual RFC. I would hope (and encourage) the ISE to have that included in the title whenever possible as that is one of the ways in which we can get value from the Independent stream (I mean documenting proprietary protocols that might one day be input to the IETF stream). - Without having read the rest of the document (sorry, but it is loooooong), I really didn't find the security considerations convincing at all. I wish I had a better understanding of the kind of review the ISE calls for for such drafts. Generalising, ISE stream security considerations text seems to arrive at 5742 review at an almost random point on a continuum from really not good to great. |
2015-09-02
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2015-09-02
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2015-09-02
|
00 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2015-09-02
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2015-09-01
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2015-09-01
|
00 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2015-08-31
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2015-08-31
|
00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2015-08-28
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2015-08-27
|
00 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2015-08-21
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Created "Approve" ballot |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | New version available: conflict-review-savage-eigrp-00.txt |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Telechat date has been changed to 2015-09-03 from 2015-08-20 |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Shepherding AD changed to Alvaro Retana |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
2015-08-18
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-08-20 |
2015-08-17
|
00 | Nevil Brownlee | IETF conflict review requested |