IETF conflict review for draft-snell-additional-link-relations
conflict-review-snell-additional-link-relations-00
Yes
(Barry Leiba)
No Objection
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-12-13)
Unknown
For the author and ISE... The Abstract could probably not be any more vague! "a number", "a variety of purposes" Surprised that there are no security considerations for Terms of Service
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-12-11)
Unknown
For the author: Shouldn't s9 be Normative References?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-12-13)
Unknown
I think it really ought to be clear if the privacy-policy relation type has any relationship with P3P [1] and that it might be nice to ask W3C if they have any opinions on that. [1] http://www.w3.org/P3P/
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown