IETF conflict review for draft-snell-additional-link-relations
conflict-review-snell-additional-link-relations-00
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2012-12-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-snell-additional-link-relations@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-snell-additional-link-relations@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-snell-additional-link-relations-06 The IESG has completed a review of draft-snell-additional-link-relations-06 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Additional Link Relation Types' as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-snell-additional-link-relations/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-snell-additional-link-relations/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
|
2012-12-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
|
2012-12-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2012-12-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
|
2012-12-13
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
|
2012-12-13
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] I think it really ought to be clear if the privacy-policy relation type has any relationship with P3P [1] and that it might … [Ballot comment] I think it really ought to be clear if the privacy-policy relation type has any relationship with P3P [1] and that it might be nice to ask W3C if they have any opinions on that. [1] http://www.w3.org/P3P/ |
|
2012-12-13
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
|
2012-12-13
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] For the author and ISE... The Abstract could probably not be any more vague! "a number", "a variety of purposes" Surprised that there … [Ballot comment] For the author and ISE... The Abstract could probably not be any more vague! "a number", "a variety of purposes" Surprised that there are no security considerations for Terms of Service |
|
2012-12-13
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
|
2012-12-12
|
00 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
|
2012-12-12
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
|
2012-12-12
|
00 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
|
2012-12-12
|
00 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
|
2012-12-12
|
00 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
|
2012-12-12
|
00 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
|
2012-12-11
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
|
2012-12-11
|
00 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica |
|
2012-12-11
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
|
2012-12-11
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
|
2012-12-11
|
00 | Sean Turner | [Ballot comment] For the author: Shouldn't s9 be Normative References? |
|
2012-12-11
|
00 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Wesley Eddy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Barry Leiba | State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Barry Leiba | New version available: conflict-review-snell-additional-link-relations-00.txt |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Barry Leiba | State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Shepherding AD changed to Barry Leiba |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | The three drafts draft-wilde-profile-link-04 draft-snell-additional-link-relations-06 draft-ioseb-dzmanashvili-link-relation-08 are ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review them, as set out in RFC … The three drafts draft-wilde-profile-link-04 draft-snell-additional-link-relations-06 draft-ioseb-dzmanashvili-link-relation-08 are ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review them, as set out in RFC 5742. The following is some background for these drafts, please forward it to IESG along with this request ... These three drafts are 'supporting documentation' for IANA requests to register new codepoints in the Link Relations registry. They have been reviewed by Julian Reschke and Jan Algermissen, the Designated Experts for that Registry. Although they came from Apps Area, the WG chairs and ADs have said they should be published in the Independent Stream. (I also have a fourth draft in process that also wants to register a Link Relations codepoint, but that is not yet ready.) Thanks, Nevil -- Nevil Brownlee (ISE), rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-12-13 |
|
2012-12-10
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IETF conflict review requested |