IETF conflict review for draft-tcs-coap-no-response-option

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Alexey Melnikov) Yes

Comment (2016-07-16)
No email
send info
COAP options need Expert Review to register. An earlier codepoint was registered, but codepoint values depend on bits that denote properties of options. In Buenos Aires the list of properties has changed, thus the codepoint change.

The draft was presented in COAP and Carsten (one of co-chairs) agrees that the option allocation is correct and that the document should be published.

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Deborah Brungard) No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja K├╝hlewind) No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection