IETF conflict review for draft-touch-sne
conflict-review-touch-sne-01

Yes

(Martin Duke)

No Objection

Erik Kline
Murray Kucherawy
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Lars Eggert)
(Martin Vigoureux)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Erik Kline
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Martin Duke Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00) Unknown 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
        
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2021-12-01 for -00)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
DTLS 1.3 also has similar work on using wider sequence numbers at the endpoints
without changing the width sent on the wire.
So, the conflict review response might also mention the TLS WG.

I would have been okay-to-happy to see this get published in the IETF stream.
The shepherd writeup notes that there's no obvious home in the IETF without
restricting it to a specific protocol, which is hard to argue with.  In the
absence of an AD expressing desire to AD-sponsor it, ISE seems like a reasonable
home.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Lars Eggert Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -00)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -00)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent