IETF conflict review for draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding
conflict-review-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-00

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "Nevil Brownlee" ,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding@ietf.org
Cc: "The IESG" ,
    iana@iana.org,
    "IETF-Announce"
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-12

The IESG has completed a review of
draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-12 consistent with
RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Recommendations for
Prefix Binding in the Softwire DS-Lite Context'
as an
Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
SOFTWIRE, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.



The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

[Ballot discuss]
Want to check that it's entirely out of the question that the softwire WG would want to pursue recommendations that may come into conflict with those specified in this document? Otherwise it seems problematic to have this go over to the ISE and create the potential for conflicting recommendations.