IETF conflict review for draft-wilde-xml-patch
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
This is related to earlier http-patch and json-patch work, and borrows from those. It's not in conflict with anything going on now, and it's gotten a review on the media-types list.
I certainly agree there's nothing here conflicting with IETF work. I presume that the ISE is trying to be cognizant of whether this conflicts with W3C work.