IETF conflict review for draft-wilde-xml-patch

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Barry Leiba Yes

Comment (2014-06-18)
No email
send info
This is related to earlier http-patch and json-patch work, and borrows from those.  It's not in conflict with anything going on now, and it's gotten a review on the media-types list.

(Pete Resnick) Yes

Comment (2014-06-23)
No email
send info
I certainly agree there's nothing here conflicting with IETF work. I presume that the ISE is trying to be cognizant of whether this conflicts with W3C work.

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection