Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-yao-regext-bundling-registration
conflict-review-yao-regext-bundling-registration-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2021-05-24
00 Amy Vezza
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Adrian Farrel ,
    draft-yao-regext-bundling-registration@ietf.org,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Adrian Farrel ,
    draft-yao-regext-bundling-registration@ietf.org,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-yao-regext-bundling-registration-05

The IESG has completed a review of draft-yao-regext-bundling-registration-05
consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping Extension for Strict Bundling
Registration'  as an
Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
REGEXT working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-yao-regext-bundling-registration/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yao-regext-bundling-registration/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary



2021-05-24
00 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the conflict review response
2021-05-24
00 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2021-05-24
00 Amy Vezza Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent
2021-05-20
00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2021-05-20
00 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2021-05-20
00 Martin Vigoureux [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux
2021-05-19
00 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2021-05-19
00 Benjamin Kaduk
[Ballot comment]
This is an interesting document, and I'm sad that I had to go quickly through it due to time constraints.

It looks like …
[Ballot comment]
This is an interesting document, and I'm sad that I had to go quickly through it due to time constraints.

It looks like some of the examples that are supposed to contain u-labels are currently rendering as
literal HTML ampersand codes, not the expected unicode characters.  It's probably worth either a note
to the reader about the choice to present it that way to clarify the relevant codepoints, or a note to the
RFC Editor to properly handle the unicode values for final publication.  If the actual unicode values
are intended to be used, RFC 7997 suggests that the relevant Unicode codepoints should be identified
in the prose, in addition to the use of the encoded UTF-8.
2021-05-19
00 Benjamin Kaduk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk
2021-05-19
00 Francesca Palombini [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Francesca Palombini
2021-05-18
00 Warren Kumari [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Warren Kumari
2021-05-18
00 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2021-05-17
00 Éric Vyncke [Ballot comment]
Thank you Adrian for the detailed document shepherd's write-up.

-éric
2021-05-17
00 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2021-05-16
00 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2021-05-13
00 Martin Duke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Duke
2021-05-10
00 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2021-05-07
00 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2021-05-20 from 2021-04-22
2021-05-06
00 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2021-05-06
00 Murray Kucherawy Created "Approve" ballot
2021-05-06
00 Murray Kucherawy Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review
2021-05-06
00 Murray Kucherawy
The working group considered the issue of making
this a standard.  However, there really was no enforcement mechanism,
especially on the DNS side, so there …
The working group considered the issue of making
this a standard.  However, there really was no enforcement mechanism,
especially on the DNS side, so there was just no way to get agreement.
The solution that was “permitted” was to let it be published
informational.
2021-05-06
00 Murray Kucherawy New version available: conflict-review-yao-regext-bundling-registration-00.txt
2021-05-03
00 Murray Kucherawy Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd
2021-04-22
00 Lars Eggert Shepherding AD changed to Murray Kucherawy
2021-04-19
00 Cindy Morgan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2021-04-22
2021-04-17
00 Adrian Farrel IETF conflict review requested