IETF conflict review for draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding
conflict-review-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Brian Haberman) Yes

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Spencer Dawkins No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Barry Leiba) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

Comment (2013-10-23)
No email
send info
I am presuming that the IANA allocations (all of which are under "Standards Action or IESG Approval") are OK. There's no guidance in 6275 as to when these things ought to be approved, and I assume we're going to see a Management Item at some point to approve these allocations, but I trust that the INT ADs will let the rest of us know that these allocations are fine.

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection