IETF conflict review for draft-zhou-pim-vrrp
conflict-review-zhou-pim-vrrp-00
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2016-04-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp@ietf.org, "Nevil Brownlee" , rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org Cc: "The IESG" , … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp@ietf.org, "Nevil Brownlee" , rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org Cc: "The IESG" , iana@iana.org, "IETF-Announce" Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-06 The IESG has completed a review of draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-06 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'VRRP PIM Interoperability' as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the pim WG, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-zhou-pim-vrrp/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhou-pim-vrrp/ The process for such documents is described at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
|
2016-04-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
|
2016-04-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2016-04-25
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
|
2016-04-21
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
|
2016-04-21
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
|
2016-04-21
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
|
2016-04-21
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
|
2016-04-20
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
|
2016-04-20
|
00 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
|
2016-04-20
|
00 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
|
2016-04-19
|
00 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
|
2016-04-19
|
00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
|
2016-04-19
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
|
2016-04-15
|
00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
|
2016-04-11
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
|
2016-03-16
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
|
2016-03-16
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2016-03-16
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
|
2016-03-16
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | New version available: conflict-review-zhou-pim-vrrp-00.txt |
|
2016-03-15
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
|
2016-03-15
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Telechat date has been changed to 2016-04-21 from 2016-03-17 |
|
2016-03-15
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | Shepherding AD changed to Alvaro Retana |
|
2016-03-15
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-03-17 |
|
2016-03-15
|
00 | Nevil Brownlee | IETF conflict review requested |