%% You should probably cite draft-adams-bimi-reporting-06 instead of this revision. @techreport{adams-bimi-reporting-00, number = {draft-adams-bimi-reporting-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-adams-bimi-reporting/00/}, author = {J. Trent Adams}, title = {{BIMI Reporting}}, pagetotal = 14, year = 2021, month = mar, day = 23, abstract = {To support the utility of Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI), domains publishing BIMI records may find it useful to know when their logos are failing to be displayed as expected. When an entity, for example a mailbox operator, determines whether or not to display the logo identified in the BIMI record, they may encounter errors trying to retrieve the image file. Similarly, the associated evidence document used to validate the logo may fail evaluation. In other cases, the evaluator may decide that despite everything validating, they may rely on local policies that determine validated logos should still not be displayed. This specification defines how BIMI evaluators should report their evaluation outcome back to the publisher within the context of existing Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) reports.}, }