Skip to main content

YANG model for NETCONF Event Notifications
draft-ahuang-netconf-notif-yang-05

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Alex Huang Feng , Pierre Francois , Thomas Graf , Benoît Claise
Last updated 2024-06-18
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Yang Validation 0 errors, 1 warnings
Additional resources GitHub Repository
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-ahuang-netconf-notif-yang-05
Network Working Group                                      A. Huang Feng
Internet-Draft                                               P. Francois
Updates: RFC5277 RFC8639 RFC7951 RFC9254 (if                   INSA-Lyon
         approved)                                               T. Graf
Intended status: Standards Track                                Swisscom
Expires: 19 December 2024                                      B. Claise
                                                                  Huawei
                                                            17 June 2024

               YANG model for NETCONF Event Notifications
                   draft-ahuang-netconf-notif-yang-05

Abstract

   This document defines the structure of NETCONF Event Notification in
   a YANG model to be used in NETCONF environments.  The definition of
   this YANG model allows the encoding of NETCONF Event Notifications in
   YANG compatible encodings such as JSON and CBOR.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 19 December 2024.

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Relationship to past documents  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  Relationship to RFC5277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  Relationship to RFC8639 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.3.  Relationship to RFC7951 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.4.  Relationship to RFC9254 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Differences to draft-ietf-netconf-notification-messages . . .   4
   4.  NETCONF Notification structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.1.  XML Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.2.  JSON Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.3.  CBOR Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   5.  YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     5.1.  YANG Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     5.2.  YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     7.1.  URI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     7.2.  YANG module name  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     7.3.  YANG SID-file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   8.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   Appendix A.  .sid file  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

1.  Introduction

   NETCONF Event Notifications [RFC5277] and YANG-Push [RFC8639] allow
   NETCONF [RFC6241] servers and YANG-Push publishers to send
   notifications to a data collection.  The NETCONF client and the YANG-
   Push receiver decodes the message and optionally validates the header
   and the content before forward it to the next process.  This schema
   validation process ensures to not break the data processing chain.

   The structure of a NETCONF Event notification has been defined in
   [RFC5277] using a XML Schema [W3C.REC-xml-20001006] allowing NETCONF
   nodes to validate the header schema of the notification message when
   it is encoded in XML.  However, when these notifications are sent
   using YANG-Push [RFC8639][RFC8641], they can be encoded in other
   encodings such as JSON [RFC7951] or CBOR [RFC9254].  In such cases,
   the model defined in [RFC5277] cannot be used to validate the
   notification header.

   This document defines the content of the header of such notifications
   allowing implementations to validate the schema of the notifications
   when they are encoded in other encodings than XML.  A YANG 1.1
   [RFC7950] model is defined for such purposes.

   This document updates [RFC5277], [RFC8639] and [RFC7951] specifying
   how a Notification header should be encoded.  RESTCONF Notifications
   [RFC8040] are out of scope of this document.

2.  Relationship to past documents

   This section exposes the relationship to [RFC5277], [RFC8639],
   [RFC7951] and [RFC9254].

2.1.  Relationship to RFC5277

   [RFC5277] defines a mechanism for NETCONF nodes to send notifications
   to a collector.  These are the key relationships between the current
   document and [RFC5277]:

   *  Section 2.1 of [RFC5277] defines how to configure a subscription
      to receive NETCONF Event Notifications.  The RPCs are defined in
      the XML schema in Section 3.4 of [RFC5277].  This document does
      not update or add any new RPCs to this schema.

   *  The notification structure is defined in Section 4 of [RFC5277]
      using a XML schema.  This document defines the structure of the
      notification in XML, JSON and CBOR in Section 4.  In XML, the same
      structure is used.

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

2.2.  Relationship to RFC8639

   Subscribed Notifications [RFC8639] defines a mechanism on top of
   [RFC5277] to stream notifications from the NETCONF node.  These are
   the key relationships between the current document and [RFC8639]:

   *  Section 1.4 of [RFC8639] states that the the solution uses the
      notification structure defined in [RFC5277].  This document
      replaces this structure using a YANG module allowing JSON and CBOR
      encodings.

2.3.  Relationship to RFC7951

   [RFC7951] defines how YANG data is encoded using JSON.  These are the
   key relationship points between the current document and [RFC7951]:

   *  [RFC7951] does not define explicitely how a YANG notification
      should be encoded using JSON encoding.  This document specifies
      the structure of such notification for JSON when these are used in
      a NETCONF [RFC6241] environment.

2.4.  Relationship to RFC9254

   [RFC9254] defines how YANG data is encoded using CBOR.  These are the
   key relationship points between the current document and [RFC9254]:

   *  [RFC9254] does not define explicitely how a YANG notification
      should be encoded using CBOR encoding.  [RFC9254] states that
      Notifications are container-like instances which does not follow
      how notifications are encoded in XML and JSON encodings.  This
      document replaces this statement and ensures consistency between
      the different notification structures in YANG.  This structure is
      to be used within NETCONF [RFC6241] environments.

3.  Differences to draft-ietf-netconf-notification-messages

   Note to the RFC-Editor: Please remove this section before publishing.

   [I-D.ietf-netconf-notification-messages] proposes a structure to send
   multiple notifications in a single message.  Unlike
   [I-D.ietf-netconf-notification-messages], this document defines a
   YANG module to encode NETCONF Notifications with encodings other than
   XML, which is currently not existing.  The structure for NETCONF
   notifications is defined in [RFC5277] using a XSD, but there is no
   YANG module defining the structure of the notification message sent
   by a server when the message is encoded in JSON [RFC7951] or CBOR
   [RFC9254].

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

4.  NETCONF Notification structure

   This section defines how NETCONF YANG Notifications are structured in
   XML, JSON and CBOR encodings.  The same namespace "ietf-notification"
   is used to be compliant with [RFC5277].

4.1.  XML Structure

   The same structure as defined in Section 4 of [RFC5277] is used.  The
   structure uses the XML namespace that has been defined in [RFC5277]:

     urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0

   Two child nodes within the "notification" container are expected,
   representing the event time and the notification payload.  The
   "eventTime" node is defined within the same XML namespace as the
   "notification" element and is compliant with [RFC3339].

   The name and namespace of the payload element are determined by the
   YANG module containing the notification statement representing the
   notification message.

   The following example shows a "push-update" notification defined in
   the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in XML:

   <notification xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0">
     <eventTime>2022-09-02T10:59:55.32Z</eventTime>
     <push-update xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-push">
       <id>1011</id>
       <datastore-contents>
         <interfaces xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces">
           <interface>
             <name>eth0</name>
             <oper-status>up</oper-status>
           </interface>
         </interfaces>
       </datastore-contents>
     </push-update>
   </notification>

                     Figure 1: XML-encoded notification

4.2.  JSON Structure

   A YANG notification encoded in JSON is structured as a root
   "notification" container.  The namespace of this container is the
   name of the YANG module "ietf-notification" defined in Section 5.

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   Two child nodes within the "ietf-notification:notification" container
   are expected, representing the event time and the notification
   payload.  The "eventTime" node is defined within the same namespace
   as the "ietf-notification:notification" container and is compliant
   with [RFC3339].

   The following example shows a "push-update" notification defined in
   the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in JSON:

   {
       "ietf-notification:notification": {
           "eventTime": "2023-02-10T08:00:11.22Z",
           "ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
               "id": 1011,
               "datastore-contents": {
                   "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
                       {
                           "interface": {
                               "name": "eth0",
                               "oper-status": "up"
                           }
                       }
                   ]
               }
           }
       }
   }

                    Figure 2: JSON-encoded notification

   When Notifications are implemented within RESTCONF [RFC8040]
   environments, the namespace of a notification stays "ietf-
   restconf:notification" as defined in Section 6.4 of [RFC8040].

4.3.  CBOR Structure

   YANG data can be represented in CBOR using Names or SIDs in keys.
   The following sections shows how these messages are encoded in both
   cases.

4.3.1.  CBOR encoded messages

   Notifications encoded using keys is similar to JSON encoding as
   defined in Section 3.3 of [RFC9254].  The key of the element can be
   the element itself or be namespace-qualified.  In the latter case,
   the namespace of the notification container uses the YANG module name
   "ietf-notification" defined in Section 5.

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   Two child nodes within the "ietf-notification:notification" container
   are expected, representing the event time and the notification
   payload.  The "eventTime" node is defined within the same namespace
   as the "ietf-notification:notification" container and is compliant
   with [RFC3339].

   The following example shows a "push-update" notification defined in
   the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in CBOR using names as
   keys.  The example uses the CBOR diagnostic notation as defined in
   section 3.1 of [RFC9254]:

   {
       "ietf-notification:notification": {
           "eventTime": "2023-02-10T08:00:11.22Z",
           "ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
               "id": 1011,
               "datastore-contents": {
                   "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
                       {
                           "interface": {
                               "name": "eth0",
                               "oper-status": "up"
                           }
                       }
                   ]
               }
           }
       }
   }

       Figure 3: CBOR-encoded notification using diagnostic notation

4.3.2.  CBOR encoded messages using YANG-SIDs

   A Notification encoded using YANG-SIDs replaces the names of the keys
   of the CBOR encoded message for a 63 bit unsigned integer.  This is
   defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC9254] and a process for SID allocation
   is defined in [I-D.ietf-core-sid].

   Two child nodes within the root container are expected, representing
   the event time and the notification payload.  The root container and
   the "eventTime" node uses a SID and the content of the "eventTime" is
   compliant with [RFC3339].

   This is an example of YANG-CBOR encoded notification using YANG SIDs
   [RFC9254].  The Figure 4 shows the message using the CBOR diagnostic
   notation as defined in section 3.1 of [RFC9254]:

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 7]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   {
       2551: {
           1: "2023-02-10T08:00:11.22Z",
           "ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
               "id": 1011,
               "datastore-contents": {
                   "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
                       {
                           "interface": {
                               "name": "eth0",
                               "oper-status": "up"
                           }
                       }
                   ]
               }
           }
       }
   }

        Figure 4: CBOR-encoded notification using YANG SIDs in CBOR
                            diagnostic notation

5.  YANG Module

5.1.  YANG Tree Diagram

   This YANG module adds a structure with one leaf for the datetime as
   defined in section 2.2.1 of [RFC5277].  The name of the leaf matches
   the definition of the XSD element name defined in Section 4 of
   [RFC5277].

   module: ietf-notification

     structure notification:
       +-- eventTime    yang:date-and-time

5.2.  YANG Module

   The YANG module uses the same namespace from the XML Schema defined
   in Section 4 of [RFC5277] allowing to use this YANG module to also
   validate already implemented XML encoded NETCONF Event Notifications.

   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-notification@2024-06-17.yang"
   module ietf-notification {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0";
     prefix inotif;
     import ietf-yang-types {

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 8]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

       prefix yang;
       reference
         "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
     }
     import ietf-yang-structure-ext {
       prefix sx;
       reference
         "RFC 8791: YANG Data Structure Extensions";
     }

     organization "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group";
     contact
       "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/netconf/>
        WG List:  <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>

        Authors:  Alex Huang Feng
                  <mailto:alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
                  Pierre Francois
                  <mailto:pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr>
                  Thomas Graf
                  <mailto:thomas.graf@swisscom.com>
                  Benoit Claise
                  <mailto:benoit.claise@huawei.com>";

     description
       "Defines NETCONF Event Notification structure as defined in
       RFC5277 and RFC7950. This YANG module uses the same namespace
       from the XML schema defined in Section 4 of RFC5277 to be able to
       validate already implemented XML encoded messages.

       This module can be used to validate XML encoded notifications
       [RFC7950], JSON encoded messages [RFC7951] and CBOR encoded
       messages [RFC9254]. Refer to Section 4 of RFC XXXX for more
       details.

       Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
       authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

       Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
       without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
       the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
       forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
       Relating to IETF Documents
       (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

       This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
       (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
       for full legal notices.";

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024                [Page 9]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

     revision 2024-06-17 {
       description
         "First revision";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: NETCONF Event Notification YANG";
     }

     sx:structure notification {
       leaf eventTime {
         type yang:date-and-time;
         mandatory true;
         description
           "The date and time the event was generated by the event
           source. This parameter is of type dateTime and compliant
           to [RFC3339]. Implementations must support time zones.
           The leaf name in camel case matches the name of the XSD
           element defined in Section 4 of RFC5277.";
       }
     }
   }
   <CODE ENDS>

6.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations for the NETCONF Event notifications are
   described in [RFC5277].  This documents adds no additional security
   considerations.

7.  IANA Considerations

   This document describes the URI used for the IETF XML Registry and
   registers a new YANG module name.

7.1.  URI

   IANA is requested to add this document as a reference in the
   following URI in the IETF XML Registry [RFC3688].

   URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0
   Registrant Contact: The IESG.
   XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
   Reference: RFC5277; RFC-to-be

7.2.  YANG module name

   This document registers the following YANG module in the YANG Module
   Names Registry [RFC6020], within the "YANG Parameters" registry:

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024               [Page 10]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   name: ietf-notification
   namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0
   prefix: inotif
   reference: RFC-to-be

7.3.  YANG SID-file

   IANA is requested to register a new ".sid" file in the "IETF YANG SID
   Registry" [I-D.ietf-core-sid]:

   SID range entry point: TBD
   SID range size: 50
   YANG module name: ietf-notification
   reference: RFC-to-be

   A ".sid" file is proposed in Appendix A.

8.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank Per Anderson, Andy Bierman, Carsten
   Bormann, Mohamed Boucadair, Tom Petch, Jason Sterne, Kent Watsen and
   Rob Wilton for their review and valuable comments.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [I-D.ietf-core-sid]
              Veillette, M., Pelov, A., Petrov, I., Bormann, C., and M.
              Richardson, "YANG Schema Item iDentifier (YANG SID)", Work
              in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-core-sid-24, 22
              December 2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
              draft-ietf-core-sid-24>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC3339]  Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet:
              Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024               [Page 11]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   [RFC5277]  Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Event
              Notifications", RFC 5277, DOI 10.17487/RFC5277, July 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5277>.

   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

   [RFC6991]  Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
              RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.

   [RFC7950]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
              RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.

   [RFC7951]  Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG",
              RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8639]  Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
              E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
              RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.

   [RFC8641]  Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
              for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
              September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.

   [RFC8791]  Bierman, A., Björklund, M., and K. Watsen, "YANG Data
              Structure Extensions", RFC 8791, DOI 10.17487/RFC8791,
              June 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8791>.

   [RFC9254]  Veillette, M., Ed., Petrov, I., Ed., Pelov, A., Bormann,
              C., and M. Richardson, "Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG
              in the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)",
              RFC 9254, DOI 10.17487/RFC9254, July 2022,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9254>.

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024               [Page 12]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   [W3C.REC-xml-20001006]
              Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, M., and E. Maler,
              "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)",
              W3C, October 2000,
              <https://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006>.

9.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.ietf-netconf-notification-messages]
              Voit, E., Jenkins, T., Birkholz, H., Bierman, A., and A.
              Clemm, "Notification Message Headers and Bundles", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-notification-
              messages-08, 17 November 2019,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-
              notification-messages-08>.

   [RFC8040]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
              Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.

   [RFC8340]  Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
              BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.

Appendix A.  .sid file

   Note to the RFC-Editor: Please remove this section before publishing.

   For CBOR encoding using YANG-SIDs identifiers, a ".sid" file is
   requested to IANA in Section 7.3.

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024               [Page 13]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-notification@2024-05-27.sid"
   {
     "ietf-sid-file:sid-file": {
       "module-name": "ietf-notification",
       "module-revision": "2024-05-27",
       "description": "NETCONF Event Notification structure",
       "dependency-revision": [
         {
           "module-name": "ietf-yang-types",
           "module-revision": "2013-07-15"
         },
         {
           "module-name": "ietf-yang-structure-ext",
           "module-revision": "2020-06-17"
         }
       ],
       "assignment-range": [
         {
           "entry-point": "2550",
           "size": "50"
         }
       ],
       "item": [
         {
           "namespace": "module",
           "identifier": "ietf-notification",
           "sid": "2550"
         },
         {
           "namespace": "data",
           "identifier": "/ietf-notification:notification",
           "sid": "2551"
         },
         {
           "namespace": "data",
           "identifier": "/ietf-notification:notification/eventTime",
           "sid": "2552"
         }
       ]
     }
   }
   <CODE ENDS>

             Figure 5: .sid file for "ietf-notification" module

Authors' Addresses

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024               [Page 14]
Internet-Draft       NETCONF Event Notification YANG           June 2024

   Alex Huang Feng
   INSA-Lyon
   Lyon
   France
   Email: alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr

   Pierre Francois
   INSA-Lyon
   Lyon
   France
   Email: pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr

   Thomas Graf
   Swisscom
   Binzring 17
   CH-8045 Zurich
   Switzerland
   Email: thomas.graf@swisscom.com

   Benoit Claise
   Huawei
   Email: benoit.claise@huawei.com

Huang Feng, et al.      Expires 19 December 2024               [Page 15]