Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extension for Label Switched Path (LSP) Inquiry
draft-ali-ccamp-lsp-inquiry-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zafar Ali , George Swallow , Clarence Filsfils , Ori Gerstel , Matt Hartley | ||
| Last updated | 2013-08-22 (Latest revision 2013-02-18) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
RSVP-TE reoptimization procedure for Packet Switch Capable (PSC) tunnels and non-PSC tunnels has some differences. This document highlights these differences, describes how existing procedures can be used for reoptimization of non-PSC tunnels and proposes some enhancements for reoptimization of non-PSC tunnels.
Authors
Zafar Ali
George Swallow
Clarence Filsfils
Ori Gerstel
Matt Hartley
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)