@techreport{ali-pce-remote-initiated-lsp-usage-00,
    number =    {draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-lsp-usage-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-lsp-usage/00/},
    author =    {Zafar Ali and Siva Sivabalan and Clarence Filsfils and Victor Lopez and Oscar Gonzalez de Dios and Xian Zhang},
    title =     {{Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for remote-initiated LSP Usage}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2013,
    month =     oct,
    day =       21,
    abstract =  {When active stateful PCE is used for managing PCE-initiated LSP, PCC may not be aware of the intended usage of the LSP (e.g., in a multi-layer network). PCEP Extensions for PCE-initiated MPLS and GMPLS LSP Setup specifications do not address this requirement. This draft addresses the requirement to specify on how PCC should use the remote initiated LSPs.},
}