Repeat And Request-Tag
draft-amsuess-core-repeat-request-tag-00
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Christian Amsüss , John Preuß Mattsson , Göran Selander | ||
| Last updated | 2017-07-01 | ||
| Replaces | draft-amsuess-core-request-tag | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-core-echo-request-tag | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-core-echo-request-tag | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document defines two optional extensions to the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP): the Repeat option and the Request-Tag option. Each of these options when integrity protected, such as with DTLS or OSCOAP, protects against certain attacks on CoAP message exchanges. The Repeat option enables a CoAP server to verify the freshness of a request by requiring the CoAP client to make another request and include a server-provided challenge. The Request-Tag option allows the CoAP server to match message fragments belonging to the same request message, fragmented using the CoAP Block-Wise Transfer mechanism. This document also specifies additional processing requirements on Block1 and Block2 options.
Authors
Christian Amsüss
John Preuß Mattsson
Göran Selander
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)