The Item and Collection Link Relations
draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-05

[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Mary Barnes on 2-Jan-2012 raised a
  point that deserves a document update:

  ID nits indicates that "You're using the IETF Trust Provisions'
  Section 6.b License Notice from 12 Sep 2009 rather than the newer
  Notice from 28 Dec 2009."

[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Mary Barnes on 2-Jan-2012 raised a
  point that deserves a document update:

  ID nits indicates that "You're using the IETF Trust Provisions'
  Section 6.b License Notice from 12 Sep 2009 rather than the newer
  Notice from 28 Dec 2009."

[Ballot comment]
The usefulness of this was not really clear to me, and the references are either just webpages or works-in-progress, so it's unclear to me whether it's really in-use or will actually be used.  However, I'm not personally concerned with the tidiness of this registry and trust the judgement of the ADs closer to it.

[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document as an RFC, but
I have a couple of Comments you could look at along the way.

---

I found it odd that this "specification" is Informational since it does
define things.

---

The RFC Editor will want you to remove the citation from the Abstract.
If you are providing a revised version, please fix this.

---
                     
I would have preferred you to explicitly name the registry in which you
want new entries recorded.

Upon approval of this document, IANA will register the following Link
Relation Types at http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations

Name: item
Description: The target IRI points to a resource that is a member of the
collection represented by the context IRI.
Reference: [RFCXXXX]

Name: collection
Description: The target IRI points to a resource which represents a
collection of which the context IRI is a member.
Reference: [RFCXXXX]

State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-04.txt> (The Item and Collection Link Relations) to Informational RFC


The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'The Item and Collection Link Relations'
  <draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-04.txt> as an
Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-01-05. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  RFC 5988 [RFC5988] standardized a means of indicating the
  relationships between resources on the Web. This specification
  defines a pair of reciprocal link relation types that may be used to
  express the relationship between a collection and its members.

Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)

  Distribution of this document is unlimited.  Comments should be sent
  to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see
  <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>).




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.