Special Purpose Label terminology
draft-andersson-mpls-spl-terminology-01
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Loa Andersson , Kireeti Kompella , Adrian Farrel | ||
| Last updated | 2019-02-26 | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 9017 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses and recommends a terminology that may be used when MPLS Special Purpose Labels (SPL) are specified and documented. Note: The rest of the text in this section is not really part of the abstract even though the text is placed here. It is working notes. Note: At least at the moment it is not the intention to take this document to an RFC, but it might be polled to become a wg document to see if the MPLS working group agree on the proposed terminology. Note: The changes we propose are minor, but we might have to progress the document to RFC since there is a proposed change to the "Special- Purpose Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Values" registry.
Authors
Loa Andersson
Kireeti Kompella
Adrian Farrel
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)