IANA Considerations for PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE)
draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-03
Yes
(Mark Townsley)
No Objection
(Brian Carpenter)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Russ Housley)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-06-22)
Unknown
Note: the reference to 2516 is a downref.
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-06-21)
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-06-21)
Unknown
Like Cullen, I was suprised about the ease of the registration requirements. Perhaps Specification Required would have been a better requirement.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-06-21)
Unknown
Section 1.2, paragraph 1: > In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements > of the specification. These words are often capitalized. The key > words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", > "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document > are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. "These words are often capitalized" - often? Not always?
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown