Considerations of address selection policy conflicts
draft-arifumi-6man-addr-select-conflict-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Arifumi Matsumoto , Tomohiro Fujisaki , Ruri Hiromi | ||
| Last updated | 2010-03-08 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document examines how policy conflicts happen, and how to address the conflicts. After making it clear what kind of address selection policy should be necessary, we proposed how to merge the possibily conflicting policies for each of the destination address selection policy and source address selection policy.
Authors
Arifumi Matsumoto
Tomohiro Fujisaki
Ruri Hiromi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)