Experiences from an IPv6-Only Network
draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-05

This is a very useful and well written document.

Jouni Korhonen made a number of comments and suggestions in his OPS-DIR review. None is blocking, but answering them can further improve the document and I know that the editors are already considering them. 

I support the comments / questions in Adrian's COMMENT. 

Good to see stuff like this.

general:

- A timeline would help readers understand the level of effort, e.g. 
if you could give dates for when stuff happened related to a specific
user's home being added, or anything else that gives the right 
flavour for the level of effort.

- Some ascii art n/w diagrams would be nice if you've time.

- Some version numbers (esp. for stuff that didn't work) would be good
for someone reading tihs in a few years time or who wants to try
replicate your results 

- It'd be good if you added your wget scripts as an appendix or put 'em
at some URL (again so folks can replicate) - 3rd last para of 6.2 seems
to imply that'd be useful (and that matches my own experience too)

- Is the DNS64/NAT64 setup you're recommending not more "wiretap"
friendly than a currently typical IPv4 or dual-stack network where DNS
and NAT are less coupled? Either way, that'd be worth noting I think in
section 9.

specific

- be good to point out that you don't in general need to add new APs
(3.1, 1st para)

- saying it "becomes crucial" that you can find DNS servers doesn't
explain why that's harder which may be worth saying (3.2 1st para)

- s/a year and half/a year and a half/ (s4, 1st para)

- You mention Ercisson and Skype (negatively in the latter case) but are
coy about the mobile OSes (presumably IOS and Android). I'd say do one
or the other.

- s/only couple of times/only a couple of times/

- 5.1 - expand RA on 1st use

- s/result require/results require/ or /result requires/ in 5.4

- which year is "next year" in section 8? s/next year/YYYY/

- s/cleaned from/cleaned of/ IPv4 literals