@techreport{ash-multi-area-te-compare-00,
    number =    {draft-ash-multi-area-te-compare-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ash-multi-area-te-compare/00/},
    author =    {Gerald Ash},
    title =     {{Comparison of Multi-Area TE Methods
}},
    pagetotal = 0,
    year =      2002,
    month =     feb,
    day =       26,
    abstract =  {This draft makes comparisons of various multi-area TE methods, which are evaluated against specific criteria. Four basic path selection approaches are compared: a) distributed methods, b) path-computation-server (PCS) methods (centralized \& distributed), c) interarea-flooding methods, and d) multiple-path-compare methods. These approaches include needs to support PCS functionality, query functionality, crankback functionality, summary-te-LSA functionality, and TE feedback functionality. The target is to converge on a reduced subset of required multi-area TE methods and protocol extensions.},
}