Synchronisation of Loop Free Timer Values
draft-atlas-bryant-shand-lf-timers-04
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Alia K , Stewart Bryant | ||
| Last updated | 2008-02-14 (Latest revision 2007-07-05) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-atlas-bryant-shand-lf-timers-04.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-atlas-bryant-shand-lf-timers-04.txt
Abstract
This draft describes a mechanism that enables routers to agree on a common convergence delay time for use in loop-free convergence.Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [1].
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)