Simulations Results for 3sm
draft-babiarz-pcn-explicit-marking-02
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual in tsv area)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Jozef Babiarz , Xiao-Gao Liu , Siavash Rahimi | ||
Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2007-11-19) | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | WG state | (None) | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired (IESG: Dead) | |
Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | Lars Eggert | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes the simulation setups and results for testing the Three State PCN Marking approach. Simulations done to date, demonstrate that the three state PCN marking approach has certain ability to support admission control and flow termination of real- time application flows at the congestion point(s) of the PCN-enabled network. The real-time traffic used in the simulation covers voice and video traffic with large and small numbers of flows. Conventions used in this document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [RFC2119].
Authors
Jozef Babiarz
Xiao-Gao Liu
Siavash Rahimi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)