LEDBAT++ BBR interoperability issues
draft-bagnulo-iccrg-iccrg-ledbat-bbr-interop-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Marcelo Bagnulo , Alberto Garcia-Martinez | ||
| Last updated | 2023-08-12 (Latest revision 2023-02-08) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document specifies describes some interoperability issues identified between LEDBAT++ and BBR, resulting in unexpected behaviour. Specifically, that under a set of common conditions, LEDBAT++ fails to yield in front of both BBRv1 and BBRv2(instead of the opposite expected behaviour).
Authors
Marcelo Bagnulo
Alberto Garcia-Martinez
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)