SHIM - MIPv6 Interaction
draft-bagnulo-shim6-mip-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Marcelo Bagnulo , Erik Nordmark | ||
Last updated | 2005-07-13 | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In this note, we explore the interaction between the SHIM protocol and MIPv6 protocol, identifying potential benefits and difficulties. The analysis will consider the two modes of operation of MIPv6: the Bidirectional Tunnel (BT) mode where the communication is routed through the Home Agent and the Route Optimization (RO) mode, where the communication flows directly between the Correspondent node and the mobile node.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)