%% You should probably cite draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-flowlabel-routing-01 instead of this revision.
@techreport{baker-ipv6-isis-dst-flowlabel-routing-00,
    number =    {draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-flowlabel-routing-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-flowlabel-routing/00/},
    author =    {Fred Baker},
    title =     {{Using IS-IS with Role-Based Access Control}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2013,
    month =     feb,
    day =       18,
    abstract =  {This note describes the changes necessary for IS-IS to route classes of IPv6 traffic that are defined by an IPv6 Flow Label and a destination prefix. This implies not routing "to a destination", but "traffic matching a classification tuple". The obvious application is data center inter-tenant routing using a form of role-based access control. If the sender doesn't know the value to insert in the flow label (the receiver's tenant ID), he in effect has no route to that destination.},
}