Implementation Recommendations to Improve the Scalability of RSVP-TE Deployments
draft-beeram-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-00
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(teas WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Ina Minei , Rob Shakir , Ebben Aries , Dante Pacella , Tarek Saad , Markus Jork | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2015-07-03) | ||
| Replaces | draft-beeram-mpls-rsvp-te-scaling | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Candidate for WG Adoption | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The scale at which RSVP-TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs) get deployed is growing continually and the onus is on RSVP-TE implementations across the board to keep up with this increasing demand. This document makes a set of implementation recommendations to help RSVP-TE deployments push the envelope on scaling and advocates the use of a couple of techniques - "Refresh Interval Independent RSVP (RI-RSVP)" and "Per-Peer flow-control" - for improving scaling.
Authors
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Ina Minei
Rob Shakir
Ebben Aries
Dante Pacella
Tarek Saad
Markus Jork
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)