VP8 Related Litigation Status Snapshot
draft-benham-rtcweb-vp8litigation-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | David Benham , Jonathan Rosenberg | ||
| Last updated | 2015-05-14 (Latest revision 2014-11-10) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
There remains a great deal of confusion in the industry about the state of patent litigation and IPR disclosures around VP8. To facilitate greater understanding, Duane Morris LLP drafted a paper that summarizes the current state of disclosures and patent litigation based on publically available materials, and has posted a comprehensive report on the Internet. This Internet Draft provides a high level summary of that report. Cisco Systems requested and funded Duane Morris to prepare this report.
Authors
David Benham
Jonathan Rosenberg
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)