GMPLS Based Segment Recovery
draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-00
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Lou Berger | ||
| Last updated | 2004-07-23 (Latest revision 2004-02-10) | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 4873 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes protocol specific procedures for GMPLS (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching) RSVP-TE (Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering) signaling extensions to support LSP segment protection and restoration. These extensions are intended to be compliment and be consistent with the Extensions for End-to-End GMPLS-based Recovery. Implications and interactions with Fast Reroute are also addressed.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)