IS-IS and OSPF Difference Discussions
draft-bhatia-manral-diff-isis-ospf-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual in gen area)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Manav Bhatia | ||
| Last updated | 2022-12-08 (Latest revision 2005-07-22) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired (IESG: Dead) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Alex D. Zinin | ||
| Send notices to | manav@samsung.com, danny@arbor.net, Vishwas@sinett.com, yasu@sfc.wide.ad.jp, manav@riverstonenet.com |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The increasing popularity of IS-IS [IS-IS] and OSPF [OSPF] over the years has drawn significant attention to the relative merits and de-merits of one with respect to the other. This draft presents an elaborate comparison between the two routing protocols to explain how the features and functionalities of one differs from the other. Wherever applicable the differences between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3[OSPFv3] have also been pointed out.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)