An Overview of the Design of BIMI
draft-bkl-bimi-overview-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Seth Blank , Neil Kumaran , John R. Levine | ||
Last updated | 2019-09-12 (Latest revision 2019-03-11) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI) provides a mechanism for mail senders to publish a validated logotype that mail receivers can display with the senders' messages. This document provides a brief overview of BIMI and examines some of the trade offs and decisions in its design. Discussion venue Comments on this draft may be directed to the BIMI list at bimi@ietf.org.
Authors
Seth Blank
Neil Kumaran
John R. Levine
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)