Megaco IP Phone Media Gateway
draft-blatherwick-megaco-ipphone-00
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Bach , Peter Blatherwick , Phil Holland , Bob Bell | ||
| Last updated | 2012-04-18 (Latest revision 1999-05-21) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-megaco-ipphone | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-megaco-ipphone | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document is a proposal to add new event/signal packages and termi- nation classes to the Megaco protocol [3], to support an IP telephone MG. The proposal covers the requirements (section 3), design approach (section 4) and resource/termination model (section 5) to be used for IP telephones. The new event/signal packages and termination classes are defined in sections 6 and 7 respectively. Megaco protocol issues affecting effective implementation of IP telephones, including complexity, reliable transport, message encoding, security and others are presented in section 8. The proposal represents a current view from the TIA working group on IP telephone specification, TIA TR-41.3.4, with the intent of using this as part of its 'whole device' specification as a method of device control.
Authors
Richard Bach
Peter Blatherwick
Phil Holland
Bob Bell
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)