Accounting Protocol and Record Format Features
draft-blount-acct-service-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Author | Alan W. Blount | ||
Last updated | 1999-09-24 | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses features of Internet-centric accounting record formats and protocols. It advocates the separation of record format and transport protocol. It argues for the facility to create service definitions without modification to the base record format or protocol.'Rich' service definition capabilities, with the ability to describe compound events, are described.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)