IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile
draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile-03
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ron Bonica , Fred Baker , Geoff Huston , Bob Hinden , Ole Trøan , Fernando Gont | ||
| Last updated | 2018-07-23 | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 8900 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document provides an overview of IP fragmentation. It also explains how IP fragmentation reduces the reliability of Internet communication. Finally, this document proposes alternatives to IP fragmentation and provides recommendations for application developers and network operators.
Authors
Ron Bonica
Fred Baker
Geoff Huston
Bob Hinden
Ole Trøan
Fernando Gont
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)