A feature freezer for the Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL)
draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-freezer-09
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Carsten Bormann | ||
| Last updated | 2022-06-29 (Latest revision 2021-12-26) | ||
| Replaces | draft-bormann-cddl-freezer | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In defining the Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL), some features have turned up that would be nice to have. In the interest of completing this specification in a timely manner, the present document was started to collect nice-to-have features that did not make it into the first RFC for CDDL, RFC 8610, or the specifications exercising its extension points, such as RFC 9165. It is now time to discuss thawing some of the concepts discussed here. A number of additional proposals have been added.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)