%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-core-block instead of this I-D.
@techreport{bormann-core-coap-block-01,
    number =    {draft-bormann-core-coap-block-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-core-coap-block/01/},
    author =    {Carsten Bormann},
    title =     {{Sliced transfers in CoAP}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2010,
    month =     oct,
    day =       24,
    abstract =  {CoAP is a RESTful transfer protocol for constrained nodes and networks. CoAP is based on datagram transport, which limits the maximum size of resource representations that can be transferred without too much fragmentation. A previous version of this draft defined the Block option. The Block option provides a minimal way to transfer larger representations in a block-wise fashion. It is currently documented in the WG draft draft-ietf-core-block-00.txt This short I-D attempts to pick up some recent discussion on the CoRE mailing list, and defines a more general, but also slightly more complex approach. It is intended as an example for a complete design based on this discussion, to enable a rational assessment of the relative complexities.},
}