%% You should probably cite draft-boucadair-pcp-failure-06 instead of this revision.
@techreport{boucadair-pcp-failure-05,
    number =    {draft-boucadair-pcp-failure-05},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-pcp-failure/05/},
    author =    {Mohamed Boucadair and Reinaldo Penno},
    title =     {{Port Control Protocol (PCP) Failure Scenarios}},
    pagetotal = 21,
    year =      2013,
    month =     feb,
    day =       15,
    abstract =  {This document identifies and analyzes several PCP failure scenarios. Identifying these failure scenarios are useful to assess the efficiency of the protocol and also to decide whether new extensions are needed to the base PCP. A procedure to retrieve the explicit dynamic mapping(s) from the PCP Server is proposed. This procedure relies upon the use of a new PCP OpCode and Option: GET/NEXT.},
}