Skip to main content

IMAP REPLACE Extension
draft-brandt-imap-replace-00

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
Author Stuart Brandt
Last updated 2015-04-29
Replaced by draft-ietf-extra-imap-replace, RFC 8508
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-brandt-imap-replace-00
Network Working Group                                          S. Brandt
Internet-Draft                                                       AOL
Intended status: Standards Track                          April 29, 2015
Expires: October 31, 2015

                         IMAP REPLACE Extension
                      draft-brandt-imap-replace-00

Abstract

   This document defines an IMAP extension which can be used to replace
   an existing message in a message store with a new message.  Message
   replacment is a common operation for clients that automatically save
   drafts or notes as a user composes them.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on October 31, 2015.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft           IMAP REPLACE Extension               April 2015

Table of Contents

   1.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  REPLACE and UID REPLACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.1.  Advertising Support for REPLACE . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.2.  REPLACE Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.3.  UID REPLACE Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.4.  Semantics of REPLACE and UID REPLACE  . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.5.  IMAP State Diagram Impacts  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Interaction with other extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.1.  RFC 4314, ACL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.2.  RFC 4469, CATENATE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.3.  RFC 4315, UIDPLUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.4.  RFC 6785, IMAP Events in Sieve  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.5.  RFC 7162, CONDSTORE/QRESYNC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   5.  Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   8.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8

1.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

   Formal syntax is defined by [RFC5234].

   Example lines prefaced by "C:" are sent by the client and ones
   prefaced by "S:" by the server.

2.  Overview

   This document defines an IMAP [RFC3501] extension to facilitate
   replacing an existing message with a new one.  This is accomplished
   by defining a new REPLACE command and extending the UID command to
   allow UID REPLACE.

   Using commands from the base IMAP specification, replacement of a
   message involves three separate commands issued in serial fashion;
   APPEND, STORE, EXPUNGE.  Pipelining of these three commands is not
   recommended since failure of any individual command should prevent
   subsequent commands from being executed lest the original message

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft           IMAP REPLACE Extension               April 2015

   version be lost.  The REPLACE command is intended to provide an
   atomic alternative to the existing non-atomic sequence.

   Because of the non-atomic nature of the existing sequence,
   interruptions can leave messages in intermediate states which can be
   seen and acted upon by other clients.  Such interruptions can also
   strand older revisions of messages, thereby forcing the user to
   manually clean up multiple revisions of the same message in order to
   avoid wasteful quota consumption.  Additionally, the existing
   sequence can fail on APPEND due to an over-quota condition even
   though the subsequent STORE/EXPUNGE would free up enough space for
   the newly revised message.  And finally, server efficiencies may be
   possible with a single logical message replacement operation as
   compared to the existing APPEND/STORE/EXPUNGE sequence.

   In its simplest form, the REPLACE command is an atomic encapsulation
   of STORE + UID EXPUNGE + APPEND.  Servers that support the REPLACE
   command MUST guarantee atomicity; either the specified message is
   completely replaced by the supplied message, or the specified message
   is left unmodified and no part of the supplied message data is
   stored.  Servers supporting REPLACE also MUST NOT infer any
   inheritance of content, flags, or annotations from the message being
   replaced.

3.  REPLACE and UID REPLACE

3.1.  Advertising Support for REPLACE

   Servers that implement the REPLACE extension will return "REPLACE" as
   one of the supported capabilities in the CAPABILITY command response.

3.2.  REPLACE Command

   Arguments:  message sequence number
               mailbox name
               OPTIONAL flag parenthesized list
               OPTIONAL date/time string
               message literal

   Responses: no specific responses for this command

   Result:     OK - replace completed
               NO - replace error; can't remove specified message
                    or can't add new message content
               BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft           IMAP REPLACE Extension               April 2015

   Example:
     C: A003 REPLACE 4 Drafts (\Seen \Draft) {312}
     S: + Ready for literal data
     C: Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 00:05:00 -0500 (EST)
     C: From: Fritz Schmidt <fritz.ze@example.org>
     C: Subject: happy new year !!
     C: To: miss.mitzy@example.org
     C: Message-Id: <B238822388-0100000@example.org>
     C: MIME-Version: 1.0
     C: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
     C:
     C: Just saw the best fireworks show. Wish you were here.
     C:
     S: * 4 EXPUNGE
     S: A003 OK [APPENDUID 1 2000] Replace completed

3.3.  UID REPLACE Command

   This extends the first form of the UID command (see [RFC3501]
   Section 6.4.8) to add the REPLACE command defined above as a valid
   argument.  This form of REPLACE uses a UID rather than sequence
   number as its first parameter.

   Example:
     C: A004 UID REPLACE 2000 Drafts (\Seen \Draft) {350}
     S: + Ready for literal data
     C: Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 00:06:00 -0500 (EST)
     C: From: Fritz Schmidt <fritz.ze@example.org>
     C: Subject: happy new year !!
     C: To: miss.mitzy@example.org
     C: Message-Id: <B238822389-0100000@example.org>
     C: MIME-Version: 1.0
     C: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
     C:
     C: Just saw the best fireworks show. Wish you were here.
     C: Hopefully next year you can join us.
     C:
     S: * 4 EXPUNGE
     S: A004 OK [APPENDUID 1 2001] Replace completed

3.4.  Semantics of REPLACE and UID REPLACE

   The REPLACE and UID REPLACE commands take five arguments: a message
   identifier, a named mailbox, an optional parenthesized flag list, an
   optional message date/time string, and a message literal.  The
   message literal will be appended to the named mailbox, and the
   message specified by the message identifier will be removed from the

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft           IMAP REPLACE Extension               April 2015

   selected mailbox.  These operations will appear to the client as a
   single action.  This has the same effect as the following sequence:

      1. [UID] STORE +FLAGS.SILENT \DELETED
      2. UID EXPUNGE
      3. APPEND

   In the cited sequence, the original message is removed first to avoid
   possible quota implications of APPENDing new data first.
   Additionally, the EXPUNGE portion of the sequence only applies to the
   specified message, not all messages flagged as \Deleted.

   Although the effect of REPLACE is identical to the steps above, the
   semantics are not identical; similar to MOVE [RFC6851], the
   intermediate states produced do not occur, and the response codes are
   different.  In particular, the response codes for EXPUNGE and APPEND
   will be returned while those for the STORE operation MUST NOT be
   generated.

   When an error occurs while processing REPLACE or UID REPLACE, the
   server MUST NOT leave the selected mailbox in an inconsistent or
   modified state; any untagged EXPUNGE response MUST NOT be sent until
   all actions are successfully completed.  Additionally, the target
   mailbox MUST NOT be modified until all actions are successfully
   completed.

   Because of the similarity of REPLACE to APPEND, extensions that
   affect APPEND affect REPLACE in the same way.  Response codes such
   TRYCREATE (see [RFC3501] Section 6.3.11), as well as those defined by
   extensions, are sent as appropriate.  See Section 4 for more
   information about how REPLACE interacts with other IMAP extensions.

3.5.  IMAP State Diagram Impacts

   Unlike the APPEND command which is valid in the authenticated state,
   the REPLACE command MUST only be valid in the selected state.  This
   difference from APPEND is necessary since REPLACE operates on message
   sequence numbers.

4.  Interaction with other extensions

   This section describes how REPLACE interacts with some other IMAP
   extensions.

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft           IMAP REPLACE Extension               April 2015

4.1.  RFC 4314, ACL

   The ACL rights [RFC4314] required for UID REPLACE are the union of
   the ACL rights required for UID STORE, UID EXPUNGE, and APPEND.

4.2.  RFC 4469, CATENATE

   Servers supporting both REPLACE and CATENATE [RFC4469] MUST support
   the addtional append-data and resp-text-code elements defined the
   Formal Syntax section of RFC4469 in conjunction with the REPLACE
   command.

4.3.  RFC 4315, UIDPLUS

   Servers supporting both REPLACE and UIDPLUS [RFC4315] MUST send
   APPENDUID in response to a UID REPLACE command.  The only exceptions
   to this are the ones outlined for APPEND in RFC4315 section 3.

4.4.  RFC 6785, IMAP Events in Sieve

   REPLACE applies to IMAP events in Sieve [RFC6785] in the same way
   that APPEND does.  Therefore, REPLACE can cause a Sieve script to be
   invoked with the imap.cause set to "APPEND".  Because the
   intermediate state of STORE +FLAGS.SILENT \DELETED is not exposed by
   REPLACE, no action will be taken that results in a imap.cause of
   FLAG.

4.5.  RFC 7162, CONDSTORE/QRESYNC

   Servers implementing both REPLACE and CONDSTORE/QRESYNC [RFC7162]
   MUST treat the message being replaced as if it were being removed
   with a UID EXPUNGE command.  Sections 3.2.9 and 3.2.10 of RFC 7162
   are particularly relevant for this condition.

5.  Formal Syntax

   The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
   Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [RFC5234].  [RFC3501] defines
   the non-terminals "capability","command-select", "mailbox", and "seq-
   number".  [RFC4466] defines the non-terminal "append-message".

   Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case-
   insensitive.  The use of upper or lower case characters to define
   token strings is for editorial clarity only.  Implementations MUST
   accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft           IMAP REPLACE Extension               April 2015

   capability     =/ "REPLACE"

   command-select =/ replace
   replace        = "REPLACE" SP seq-number SP mailbox append-message
   uid            = "UID" SP (copy / fetch/ search / store / move /
                              replace)

6.  Security Considerations

   This document is believed to add no security problems beyond those
   that may already exist with the base IMAP specificaiton.

7.  IANA Considerations

   The IANA is requested to add REPLACE to the "IMAP 4 Capabilities"
   registry, http://www.iana.org/assignments/imap4-capabilities.

8.  Acknowledgements

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC3501]  Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION
              4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003.

   [RFC4314]  Melnikov, A., "IMAP4 Access Control List (ACL) Extension",
              RFC 4314, December 2005.

   [RFC4315]  Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) -
              UIDPLUS extension", RFC 4315, December 2005.

   [RFC4466]  Melnikov, A. and C. Daboo, "Collected Extensions to IMAP4
              ABNF", RFC 4466, April 2006.

   [RFC4469]  Resnick, P., "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP)
              CATENATE Extension", RFC 4469, April 2006.

   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.

   [RFC6785]  Leiba, B., "Support for Internet Message Access Protocol
              (IMAP) Events in Sieve", RFC 6785, November 2012.

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 7]
Internet-Draft           IMAP REPLACE Extension               April 2015

   [RFC7162]  Melnikov, A. and D. Cridland, "IMAP Extensions: Quick Flag
              Changes Resynchronization (CONDSTORE) and Quick Mailbox
              Resynchronization (QRESYNC)", RFC 7162, May 2014.

9.2.  Informative References

   [RFC6851]  Gulbrandsen, A. and N. Freed, "Internet Message Access
              Protocol (IMAP) - MOVE Extension", RFC 6851, January 2013.

Author's Address

   Stuart Brandt
   AOL
   43623 Preddy Ct
   Ashburn, VA  20147
   USA

   Email: stujenerin@aol.com

Brandt                  Expires October 31, 2015                [Page 8]