Password-Authenticated Key (PAK) Diffie-Hellman Exchange
draft-brusilovsky-pak-10

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <iana@iana.org>, ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be: 
         draft-brusilovsky-pak-10.txt 

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Password-Authenticated 
Diffie-Hellman Exchange (PAK)' <draft-brusilovsky-pak-10.txt> as an 
Informational RFC. 

The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in 
the datatracker 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=13838&rfc_flag=0) 
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit 
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot 
and the comment log. 

The IESG contact person is Tim Polk.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brusilovsky-pak-10.txt


The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html.

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document specifies a variant of password-authenticated
   Diffie-Hellman.

Working Group Summary

   This document is an individual submission 

Document Quality

   This variant of password-authenticated-DH is also specified
   in ITU-T X.1035.

Personnel

   Tim Polk reviewed this document for the IESG.

RFC Editor Note

    The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF
      work.

IESG Note

   Please include the following IESG note immediately following the
   "Status of this Memo" section of the finished RFC:

      This RFC is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard.
      The IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this RFC for
      any purpose and in particular notes that the decision to publish
      is not based on IETF review for such things as security,
      congestion control, or inappropriate interaction with deployed
      protocols.  The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at
      its discretion.  Readers of this document should exercise caution
      in evaluating its value for implementation and deployment.  See
      RFC 3932 for more information.

RFC Editor Note