%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-v6ops-prefer8781 instead of this I-D. @techreport{buraglio-deprecate7050-01, number = {draft-buraglio-deprecate7050-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/01/}, author = {Nick Buraglio and Tommy Jensen and Jen Linkova}, title = {{Discouraging use of RFC7050 for Discovery of IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis}}, pagetotal = 9, year = 2024, month = nov, day = 15, abstract = {RFC7050 describes a method for detecting the presence of DNS64 and for learning the IPv6 prefix used for protocol translation (RFC7915). This methodology depends on the existence of a well-known IPv4-only fully qualified domain name "ipv4only.arpa.". Because newer methods exist that lack the requirement of a higher level protocol, instead using existing operations in the form of native router advertisements, discovery of the IPv6 prefix used for protocol translation using RFC7050 should be discouraged. RFC7050 MAY only be used if other methods (such as RFC8781{]}) can not be used.}, }