SIP Interface to VoiceXML Media Services
draft-burke-vxml-03
No Objection
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
No Record
Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Mahesh Jethanandani
Murray Kucherawy
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Warren Kumari
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Cullen Jennings)
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 10 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Deb Cooley
No Record
Erik Kline
No Record
Francesca Palombini
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Jim Guichard
No Record
John Scudder
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Murray Kucherawy
No Record
Orie Steele
No Record
Paul Wouters
No Record
Roman Danyliw
No Record
Warren Kumari
No Record
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Record
Éric Vyncke
No Record
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2007-02-06)
Unknown
So, if we slavishly obey RFC 3932 we would have to say "The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to the IETF work done in the MediaCtrl WG and recommends not publishing the document at this time." But of course that is inaccurate and unnecessarily rude. I believe we should ignore the strict text of 3932 and say what Cullen tells us: "The IESG understands that the authors wish to bring this work to the future MediaCtrl WG and recommends not publishing the document at this time."
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
No Record
No Record
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2007-02-07)
Unknown
I support Cullen's DISCUSS and would prefer to see this document withdrawn from the RFC Editor publication track and submitted to MEDIACTRL. If this does not happen I would suggest that an appropriate IESG note is attached to the document.