SIP Interface to VoiceXML Media Services
draft-burke-vxml-03
No Objection
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
No Record
Andy Newton
Charles Eckel
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Gorry Fairhurst
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mahesh Jethanandani
Mike Bishop
Mohamed Boucadair
Roman Danyliw
Tommy Jensen
(Cullen Jennings)
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 10 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Andy Newton
No Record
Charles Eckel
No Record
Christopher Inacio
No Record
Deb Cooley
No Record
Éric Vyncke
No Record
Gorry Fairhurst
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Jim Guichard
No Record
Ketan Talaulikar
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Mike Bishop
No Record
Mohamed Boucadair
No Record
Roman Danyliw
No Record
Tommy Jensen
No Record
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2007-02-06)
Unknown
So, if we slavishly obey RFC 3932 we would have to say "The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to the IETF work done in the MediaCtrl WG and recommends not publishing the document at this time." But of course that is inaccurate and unnecessarily rude. I believe we should ignore the strict text of 3932 and say what Cullen tells us: "The IESG understands that the authors wish to bring this work to the future MediaCtrl WG and recommends not publishing the document at this time."
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
No Record
No Record
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2007-02-07)
Unknown
I support Cullen's DISCUSS and would prefer to see this document withdrawn from the RFC Editor publication track and submitted to MEDIACTRL. If this does not happen I would suggest that an appropriate IESG note is attached to the document.